otriwki1-engl

Whether you can imagine flight by the plane if you never flied? And whether you can imagine parachute jump if you never jumped? Or to imagine sensation of weightlessness if you never tested her? Probably, no, or your representation of sensations will be not such. Recollect the life experience. Everything, what you make for the first time, you not so-so represented it?

The same flight by the plane. Sowing in him for the first time, a kind of the Earth from height, you, probably, not so-so represented? All our life experience develops of storing sensations in the different phenomena. Subjects downwards fall, means, we think, and should be. The false impression is created, that differently and cannot be, as though the body in air cannot be kept, and it should necessary to fall downwards.

And if was differently? If the person and all on a planet would live in conditions of weightlessness? And if you to them have got, you could explain to them that if their planet rotated more slowly they could come nearer to ground without any cords, and what she would draw them? They, probably, would make a fun of you. Such cannot be, they how the ground can draw, through air would tell, whether that? That is all representations about the World at us especially "objective", and the objective can be any.

The objective at our eye long focus would be , we 6ы saw all as in the field-glass. Far objects would seem relatives, distances between objects would seem short, and all space would seem flattened. And on the contrary, at

objective with short focus of an eye, the space would seem stretched (dragged out), distances between objects - the big, close subjects - are strongly deformed, extended own hand would seem more longly (look in the field-glass on the contrary). I want to tell it that all in the nature be relative, and is impossible to accept the habitual sensations for "a pure (clean) coin". It is necessary to be able to look in a root: why it so, instead of differently, and whence I look. Not always it is possible to trust sensations, and not simply to trust, and to penetrate into essence of the phenomenon.

People very much frequently do not trouble themselves to reflect even above the simple phenomena, and blindly rely on feeling.

2. In what case to come to coast is faster: to be floating to coast on current and under a small corner, or to be floating under a right angle to coast?

I think, that it is all should be clear. In a moving train how it is easier to you to go on the car, on a course of a train or against a course? And you come into a compartment unless under a slanting corner?

If you are in a moving train, whether you feel the movement? I have no in view of rocking and drifts here and there. You can easy play tennis, or in everything, and any differences from game on the Earth will not be. They also cannot be, as you are in a condition of the same rest, as well as on the Earth. Can do (make) the same both in the plane, and it does not depend on speed, what she would not be. The condition of rest to you is provided, if only the engine on you did not press. On the Earth and in air all power consumption of the engine leaves on providing to you a condition of rest instead of that all time to push you. If in space to push a subject it will fly indefinitely for a long time and never will stop. Then, to stop it, it is necessary to spend exactly as much energy, how many it has been spent for his dispersal. To give it energy or to take her is this one and too. To stop or disperse - and this one and too, and all this be relative. Free flight is too a condition of rest. If we speak - to stop any body, concerning what? This body is in the same equal in rights space, in what and you. From his point of view, it will be - dispersal, i.e. change of speed (space). Also there is no such peg or an anchor in emptiness which would measure your speed. Where you, there and your anchor (a condition of rest), and speed - concept relative.[1] And I do not understand such when speak: « there Is no absolute rest »???

Whether instead of easier to tell so : « there Is no absolute movement, everywhere rest! »

Two rockets are in space beside in a condition of rest, engines are switched off. Rockets with cosmonauts are in a condition of weightlessness. One rocket (let it will be in our example 2-n a rocket) includes for a while the engine, and sails from the first rocket.

Where F – force (in kg) (on 1 kg forces, acceleration of weight of 1 kg = 9,8 m/s²) , m – weight (in kg), a – acceleration (in m*s²).

In some seconds the engine is switched off. The speed typed by a rocket, will be

Where V – the speed typed by a rocket, a – acceleration, t – an operating time of the engine (in sek.).

It is possible to calculate the speed typed by a rocket at once, having substituted the first formula in the second:

Now rockets miss constant speed V, and the distance between them will grow indefinitely.

It is possible to tell, that 1-n the rocket is based, and 2-n goes, and it is possible and on the contrary.

«Bodies concerning which movement is considered (examined), refer to as bodies of readout».

Overload, which is similar to weight, the cosmonaut and all subjects of the second rocket, tested only in an operating time of the engine and when the engine was switched off again there comes weightlessness.

Will work how many the engine, opposite directed force – force of inertia so much will operate. Force of counteraction to the engine, all weight of a rocket with all its contents, in accuracy will be equal to force of action, and refers to as force of inertia. It is defined as inert weight, or simply weight. Its measurement have accepted equal to weight on the Earth. We shall assume, that a rocket with all its contents, with fuel, and weighs on the Earth 100 t , the weight of her means is equal 100 t. Now we shall take the same rocket in distances from gravitation, and we shall include the engine and force of draft it is done = 100 t .
It means, that on everyone of 1 kg of weight of a rocket operates force of draft of the engine – 1 kg, i.e. force of draft, is distributed in regular intervals on all weight of a rocket.

The rocket, with all subjects in it, will start to move with the same acceleration, as well as on the Earth acceleration of free falling – 9,8 m/c²

Now, if to weigh subjects in a rocket they will correspond to weight on the Earth.
If we shall include draft of the engine of a rocket = 200 t (at the same weight of a rocket – 100 t) acceleration of a rocket will be 9,8*2 = 19,6 m/c², and the weight of all rocket and each subject in it will be doubled. If now to put on balance the weight - 1 kg the weight of her will be – 2 kg, it that we name an overload – 2 g. Force of counteraction, i.e. force of inertia, it will be natural same – 200 t.
If draft of the engine will be: the weight of all rocket * on 5 also the overload will be 5 g, and acceleration - 9,8*5 m/c², and weight of each subject in a rocket will be = his weight * 5.
After deenergizing the engine, force (weight) disappears, and disappears as force of counteraction, (force of inertia), comes weightlessness (absence of weight). The typed speed is kept, now is absent both force of draft, and force of inertia. Now the typed speed can be accepted for a zero, for a condition of rest.
It also is Inertial System of Readout where is absent forces of influence through the area of a support, or it is possible to tell so: there is no unilateral dynamic deformation of ph.

Let's consider, what picture was observed by the cosmonaut of the second rocket during dispersal:

The cosmonaut "sat" in an armchair back to the engine, different subjects hung on all cabin of a rocket. When the engine the cosmonaut has felt weight in a body has joined, and the sensation of top, a bottom has appeared. Below – the engine, above – a nose of a rocket. All subjects both hung, and continued to hang on a place, but from the point of view of the cosmonaut, they have started to fall with acceleration, i.e. the rocket has gone with acceleration, and subjects hang on a place until the floor will not drive into them. Further, when subjects will adjoin to a floor, they the same as also the cosmonaut, will test deformation, but each subject – different.

But there are no unbalanced forces if to a body force there is also a reciprocal force is applied.

«Forces with which two bodies operate against each other, are equal on size and opposite on a direction».

In our example it means, that force of draft of the engine on the one hand operates, and force of resistance is and there is a force of inertia, and she appears only when on a body force will work. And when subjects have fallen to a floor, to be exact a floor has driven into subjects they began to press on a floor as well as a floor on them, it that we name weight. And the weight appears only when there is a point (area) of a support. The weight – the greater weight is more, the weight – smaller weight is less, and force of resistance of all rocket is equal drafts of the engine.

Acceleration of falling to the Earth – 9,8 m*s² while the body falls, deformation at him as is absent, i.e. the body is in weightlessness. When the body lays on the Earth (or a support) it as tests deformation, as well as at dispersal with this acceleration.

Time we live on the Earth have accepted to measure weight in weight on the Earth, would live on the Jove also weight would measure by weight on the Jove, and for the nature all the same, than we shall measure her, kg, arshin, or bast shoes. And all these disputes on equality of inert weight and gravitational – are empty.

So, the second rocket leaves from the first with constant speed. Now to stop (concerning the first), it should be developed (unwrapped), include engines with the same draft for same time. The rocket will stop (concerning the first), and its removal (distance) from the first will depend on the gone way during dispersal, and time of stay for the typed speed. And to return back to the first rocket, it is necessary for it to make the same actions of dispersal and braking in the opposite direction. It is possible to return faster, having applied the greater acceleration.

Such actions, with flying away and returning, 6 parties (sides) are possible to do (make) in all, and all will be identical. When engines of rockets are switched off, and they miss, or approach, any of rockets can be accepted for based, and another for moving, in both rockets there will be a weightlessness and a condition of rest.

If to throw a stone from any rocket it will depart with that speed which was given to it with effort of a hand. Will depart with constant speed (from the moment of to tear off by hand), rectilinearly and in regular intervals, concerning a rocket, and will leave it irrevocably. Can throw stones in six directions, and there will be no difference.

Not to get tired to repeat: Speed – concept relative and that was clearly: it is possible to tell, speed – concept senseless.

There is no physical speed as the some people think. Speed does not smell, there are no changes in a body from speed, she cannot be found out any experiences. Inertial movement does not bear in itself any physical attributes, or changes and as there are no forces, neither supporting movement, nor braking it. There is no reference, based anchor in emptiness, and the roulette cannot be put to emptiness.

Now we shall consider the above-stated examples with two rockets in the other variant.

Two rockets as are beside, engines are switched off. But now they are in a zone of an attraction of a star, fall on it. Cosmonauts also will not know about it. The same weightlessness, also does not happen any other weightlessness and as rockets hang opposite each other, and are not displaced. Only will see, that the star every day all becomes brighter and brighter.

Though one rocket, though two, though ten if they do not move be relative each other can count it one "system".

In this "system" all occurs precisely the same as and in the above described examples. As can sail away from the partner in any of six directions, stop (concerning it), the same way to come back to it.

As in any direction can throw stones, they will leave you irrevocably in regular intervals and rectilinearly. Consider that your "system" is based, and that she somewhere falls, it can and not take in a head in the calculations of movements in "system", can count "system" an anchor of rest. Also it is not necessary to pay attention to "system" of that star where you fall, she too flies around of the center of the Galaxy, and the Galaxy still somewhere, etc. That to you of what your "system" somewhere flies ?

« If on a body other bodies it keeps a condition of rest or rectilinear uniform movement » do not operate.

It also refers to as " Inertial System of Readout », and what she goes with acceleration in other "system", well and what? Acceleration in fact not through the area of a support, i.e. not through deformation of a body, and is simple movement (rest) in the curved space on which, I repeat, it is possible to not pay attention. The three-dimensional space is curved in the fourth measurement, and the fourth measurement is there is time, and movement is a moving to time, i.e. in the fourth measurement.

To you and not uniform movement, concerning that system, where fall, because you (your "system") changes spaces in unit of time – i.e. in the fourth measurement.

And in this "system" all occurs precisely the same as as if she is based, and on mechanics this falling is not reflected in any way.

And in general all our World are follies of set of three-dimensional spaces in the fourth measurement.

And than the big speed from small differs? Running beforehand, I shall answer at once: anything, all is absolutely identical. And how, you ask, to be with a constancy of speed of light?

Now and further we shall consider (examine) it on examples. We shall stipulate conditions: for simplicity of calculations and perception (recognition) we shall take speed of light With = 300 t. km/s (exactly), distance between the Earth and the Moon – 300 t. km. Two ships, distance between which too 300 t. Km., beforehand were dispersed and have switched off engines, their speed - 297 t. Km/s. They will fly by by the Earth and the Moon on the minimal distance on straight line АБ.

On the Earth and the Moon radio beacons M-1 and M-2 accordingly are established, they will fix flight, and to note time. Rockets P-1 and P-2. So, rockets fly, cosmonauts are in a condition of weightlessness, conduct among themselves a bilateral radio communication, the delay in communication (connection) between them makes 2 seconds.

In a second the observer will see P-1 opposite anchor buoy's. The forward front of a pulse will be on the Moon, and back – as on distance of 300 thousand in km. From the Earth, i.e. the epicenters of a ring will be on M-1.

But light, as is known, is distributed in all parties (sides) equally, with a speed 300 t. km/s, and forward it has departed the ship on 3 thousand in km. It is possible to assume, what in the ship has passed 10 milliseconds but how to be with back and cross-section fronts of a pulse?

We move together with rockets with the same speed and as, from the party (side) it is observable this picture, i.e. we are together with rockets in one system of readout, we shall name this "system" – Rocket space.

Proceeding from a constancy of speed of light, the iridescent ring, in system of readout of a rocket, should be same round, i.e. is strict on a compasses.

In this case we shall see, that an epicenters of an iridescent ring as it is kept on P-1, and is not dependent on that, the fog with us goes, or it is based concerning the Earth – the Moon. (Fig. 3)

Rice 3 the Kind of an event, from the point of view of the observer from rocket space.

Proceeding from symmetry of Doplers `s effect which is proved by practice (see. The chapter - 8 and the Chapter - 9 of my work), parities of forward and back fronts of an iridescent ring, terrestrial and rocket spaces, will be identical. (Fig. 9)

t_z – Time terrestrial (in our case 1000 мс) t_z = S + t (990 + 10 = 1000 ms)

Let's consider an arrangement of back and forward fronts of an iridescent ring concerning a rocket, from the point of view of the terrestrial observer (see fig. 2).

The back front will depart from a rocket: T = 2*S + t; we calculate: T = 2*990 + 10 = 1990 ms.

In system – the rocket, a pulse of light will depart from a rocket in all parties equally the same as and from the Earth (according to a constancy of speed of light), and there will correspond to time, a cat. Has passed in a rocket – t_r . As I already marked above, parities of forward and back fronts of an iridescent ring, terrestrial and rocket spaces, will be identical.

We substitute our values: t_r = √(1990* 10) = 141,067359796658844252321636908773 ms.

It means, that from the moment of flash until when the rocket will overtake an anchor buoy, on the Earth 1 second (1000 miles of seconds), and in a rocket 141,06 ms will pass, that corresponds Lorenc`s to the formula: t` = t * √ ((1 – (V²/C²)).

We check: t_r = 1000 * √ ((1 – (297²/300²)) = 1000 * √ ((1 – (88209/90000)) = 141,067359796658844252321636908773 ms.

As a matter of fact, this one and too, only from my position turns out an evident picture from which on harmonous logic the theory about set of equal in rights three-dimensional spaces follows, in the fourth measurement – time. From same my position, the formula of symmetric Effect Dopler`s for light follows also:

Now having substituted in the formula, K_d = √(T/t) values T and t we shall receive:

K_d = √ ((C + V)/(C – V)) – it also will be final and final formula Effect Dopler`s for light

which completely proves to be true in practice (look as the Chapter - 8 and the Chapter - 9).

It also proves conformity of my theory with the validity in which ALL paradoxes are resolved!

Any other explanation of "paradoxes", from a position of one uniform space, uniform time, an ether with efironami and gravitonami, with increase in weight, Lorenc`s forces and reductions, is real adjustment under standard thinking, and only adds paradoxes. It is similarly former concept – « the Earth is based upon three whales », all the same children's illness in a science.

We come back to Figure 3 where we consider events from a position of rocket space when the observer away from rockets, goes with the same speed, as rockets, i.e. is in rocket space.

When P-1 will overtake with anchor buoy's, time will pass in a rocket and at the observer – 141,06 ms, the pulse of light will depart from a rocket on 141,06 over ms. [3] in all parties (sides) in regular intervals and movement of it will be same, with a speed – C. [4]And in this system the same as and in terrestrial, the pulse has been given at a rocket, the epicentre means also will be kept at a rocket. The terrestrial space will look from rockets as under a concave lens, it is possible to make still comparison – as from the plane terrestrial objects – in the reduced kind look. The Earth with the Moon will fly behind board P-1 with an interval – 142,49 ms (on rocket time). Through 1,01 with (on rocket time), the second ship will pass the Earth, and through the same interval (142,49 ms) the Moon. Speed of the ships will not be superlight, simply galactic space will look compressed for them.

First ship P-1 has flown by by the Earth with a speed 297 t. km/s, and through 142,49 ms, behind it has passed second ship P-2, with the same speed. Through 1,01 with they will fly by by the Moon, with the same interval. The rocket space for the terrestrial observer will be same "compressed", so, and the Earth will pass their distance (300 t. Km) for 142,49 ms.

That is, when on the Earth passes 1,01 seconds, in a rocket passes 0,14249 seconds.

And on the contrary, when in a rocket passes 1,01 seconds on the Earth passes 0,14249 seconds!

And in rocket space, the Earth with the Moon move with the same speed – 297 t. km/s.

Time goes equally, but separately, it does not go one in one, it goes as though in the different parties. The beginning and the end trimming, occurs in different systems, and is not simultaneous!

Speed "bends" space, as well as a lens or gravitation. Actually she in general bends nothing (speed), it is a kind of one three-dimensional space from another three-dimensional in four-measurement.

To terrestrial observers will seem, that rockets are flattened as under a diminutive lens, and distance between them small. As also to cosmonauts will seem, that the Earth and the Moon of the smaller sizes and are flattened, and distance between them small, i.e. all will look the same as under a diminutive lens. Rockets are in the same equal in rights space, it same "wide". At cosmonauts time goes just as and at us, at them the same Евклидова geometry and the same laws of Newton, the same laws of physics and chemistry. All these Lorenc`s reductions are mutual and imaginary. It is similar to flight by the plane: all under a wing seems small as well as it seems to terrestrial observers small the plane. Simply there is a set of three-dimensional spaces in four-dimensional space.

It is impossible to put a ruler to moving object, and at what end of a ruler to look earlier, and on what later? In fact comes to to nobody mind to put a ruler to glass of a window of the plane, measuring terrestrial objects and distances between them. Or to put a ruler to a lens through which we look.

How two straight lines, for example, are crossed? In point Е (Fig. 4). Means one-dimensional spaces in two-dimensional, are crossed by a point.

How two planes are crossed? On lines АВ (Fig. 5). Means two-dimensional spaces in three-dimensional, are crossed by a line.

Means, continuing this analogy, three-dimensional spaces in four-dimensional, will be crossed by a plane. This plane passes through the objects which are flying by each other, and settles down perpendicularly to a direction of their mutual movement. It is the unique moment when concept of a simultaneity of events on objects "coincide", and further again miss. Though here too it is necessary to make the clause, a word "coincide" - only conditional concept. What with what coincides?

Imagine such "scissors" of a simultaneity, they are doubled, and at rapproachement of objects they converge, accelerated move from their past to their future (mutually). At passage each other, objects appear in a plane of crossing of spaces, "scissors" of a simultaneity for one instant will be left, it will be "hereby" (the moment of time) for both spaces, but it will be only zero instant. Further at a divergence of objects, "scissors" of a simultaneity miss in other party (side), they as though "are late" в "present" each other mutually. Such о6разом time turns to distance, and to verify hours it is possible only in one point of one space. In more detail about it, we shall consider on examples, further.

What is the speed? These are kilometers a second. But whose kilometers, and in whose second? Where a peg in emptiness concerning which I could measure the speed?

The beginning of all four coordinates can be designated in any place, and goes or there is your "beginning" is a concept is deprived any sense. Speed of current of time at all spaces: 300 thousand km/s (extending sphere – the fourth measurement). For light this speed- ¥ km/0 sek., and reflection from a mirror same instant for 0 сек., and flight back with the same speed. The light wave is anything, it is "doomsday", the end of any space, it there where time is not present, the weight is not present, the space is absent. The weight is too the concept existing in time. The word "exists" - speaks that time for it goes. Time is not present, means, and the weight is not present, and in general anything is not present. Three coordinates of space – are constantly developed in the fourth (on sphere), with speed of 300 thousand km/s. Notice: were not once developed (unwrapped), and are constantly developed. It also is – current of time, i.e. 300 thousand in km. Three measurements of space, correspond (meet) to one second of the fourth measurement of extending sphere. Or it is possible to tell on another: three measurements of space, are constantly unwrapped in time with speed of 300 thousand km/s.

In time the space, this maximal interaction limited to current of time is developed (unwrapped). We always cost (stand) on a place for current of time, and time everywhere flows equally. In any space we cost on a place, and time both went, and goes by us equally. Where you, there and your space, and whether move you whether or not, this concept relative, and it is better to tell – senseless, in any space you cost on a place, i.e. where you, there and your space (a virtual ether, and without everyone Filler's). Efir's put in concept of an ether the certain substance filling emptiness (Filler's), and do not understand that emptiness is and there is a space which they even do not consider (examine). The space has 4 measurements and does not require continuous filling.

Emptiness has dimension (volume) only at your presence. Everyone material for light (current of time), always costs on a place (and at dispersal too, only we we change spaces). Extending, with speed C the sphere is to eat with the beginning of coordinates of the fourth measurement, i.e. current of time from any point of space in outside of a point, for time is one direction. It goes and without light from any point of space, it is invisible "river", and light here not and. Movement of radio waves is a movement virtual, this movement (current) of time, and light (radio waves) is a trace in time, i.e. the "stopped" instants in it. Time is a carrier of light, and it is better so to say:

How many we were dispersed (in any party), for light (current of time) we always we cost on a place! Light catches up, overtakes us and goes to us towards always with the same speed – 300 t. Km/s from what spaces it proceeded.

If in a moving train two play tennis as on yours, it is better to investigate a trajectory of movement of a ball? From a platform? All this is equal, that a picture on a computer to draw in machine codes. Whether easier to get on a train and evidently to see his movements concerning a train, not paying attention to a moving platform. Also it is bad to study the phenomena on the big speeds, that is from other space.

Each of them will think, that at them there geometry not Euklid`s , the sizes all are reduced. And physics at them not such, not Newton`s because they will see all phenomena in the deformed kind.

How many such planes can exist in three-dimensional space? You will tell infinite set, and will be right.

But if the space четырехмерно, hence, continuing this analogy, and three-dimensional spaces can be infinite set - in four-dimensional space where all spaces are equal in rights.

Three-dimensional spaces in four-dimensional, can settle down under the attitude (relation) to each other, under different "corners", therefore and identical laws look compressed, and in each space, each space is developed in time, not in another's time, and in the!

The estimation of one space, at a sight at him from other space, will be relative. Also it is not necessary to assimilate the flat person's which estimates all World only from the plane, will measure all on the arshin, and counts that only in his plane laws "correct".

The theory of a relativity cannot be divided into the general and individual - she is UNIFORM!

Also there can not be such, that in its one place laws one, in the friend others.

The relativity of spaces, and distortions of the phenomena on the big speeds turns out, are seeming because are observed from other space.

All spaces - are equal in rights, in each space identical laws, 300 t. km Any space it is adequate to one second (the fourth measurement) same space. The infinite set of three-dimensional spaces in four-dimensional space is it is necessary to learn, to represent, and the kind of one space from another, will be deformed.

to turn out the brains inside out, to shake out from them all primitive concepts, to load their new, and to turn back.

Ljubar Vladimir Jakovlevich May, 2000 Tiraspol

[1] Literally this word.

[2] Expression – «about at horizon speeds», is radically wrong, it is obvious from a postulate on a constancy of speed of light, but on it later.

[3] over ms – light milliseconds

[4] Speed – With, will be meant hereinafter the speed of light equal to 300 thousand km/s.