Four-dimensional space? It is very simple! Or "the Theory of Spaces".
© Любарь Владимир Яковлевич
For listing in Words: here (33 kb.) on main
The chapter - 10
Speed – concept three times relative.
In a science, on a course of its development, sometimes there comes a limit when within the framework of former concepts, there is impossible its further development. In this case it is necessary to change psychology of thinking, to change border of habitual representations. To reach up to this threshold, remaining within the framework of habitual, the science cannot move in a correct direction further, and moving to a wrong direction, it is possible to tell – she costs on a place.
To learn the world is farther, and to move a science, it is necessary to step over this threshold, a limit of habitual outlook.
To someone it can is not pleasant, the person can remain in habitual, and would be desirable, that the world was such what it wants it. But the nature is relentless, and she will not be arranged under the person, and to the person all is necessary to break the warm, habitual representations if it wants to learn the world further.
I shall result an example:
Earlier there was such concept:
- the space has top and a bottom, that in space cannot hang, not having a support;
- all should fall downwards or lean on something;
- stars and other heavenly bodies are attached to a firmament;
- The Earth – flat also keeps on three whales.
Now, imagine, there comes in a history the new scientist and speaks: there are no guys, the Earth costs not on three whales, and on four, and not on whales, and on cachalot.
And all have rushed to study this fourth whale: to do assumptions of thickness of his fat, of his leather, argue his eyes and moustaches, etc.
Clearly, that this scientist "has solved" a problem, not being beyond habitual. And as soon as the person has stepped over this threshold habitual, has understood, that at space is not present top a bottom so the problem about whales has disappeared itself.
Something similar occurs now. For the theory of a relativity this limit for a long time has already come. Hundred years as the science, in the theory of a relativity is tram bled down on a place. Einstein could not step over a threshold habitual, and "has solved" a problem within the framework of habitual concepts about space, speed, but it was on a correct way. Also it is necessary to develop further physics in this direction – on a way relativity (equality of all WITH), but many till now quite seriously study "changes" on the big speeds: reduction are long, increase in weight or a charge (it is the fourth whale – medieval primitively). It actually a recognition of absoluteness of speed and a withdrawal from the Theory of the Relativity.
While people will not step over this threshold of habitual concept of space, time, speed, the science will not move from a dead point further. It to you not 2D and not 3D and 4D!
Here the new thinking is necessary!
I managed to step over this threshold, a side of habitual concepts! In my theory the Relativity is , and she uniform, present, without any exceptions where works both mechanics of Newton and electrodynamics on any speeds, and all are perfectly resolved Einstein’s paradoxes, and any speed accept for a zero, without any exceptions. But she passes in a relativity of spaces.
Instead of the slogan: «there Is no absolute rest»,
I proclaim the slogan: «there Is no absolute movement, everywhere rest!» .My theory is a new level of thinking, she overturns all habitual representations about speed, space, time.
My theory very simple, both formulas simple and beautiful.
First of all it is impossible to speak about space in a singular, their infinite set. Set of three-dimensional spaces in the fourth measurement. My theory and refers to - " the Theory of spaces ". Notice what not "spaces", and "spaces" – in plural. It is the main mistake of people, that the space one and is firm, so-called - an ether (filler), and it confuses them, putting them on a wrong way. All persistently mark in emptiness, or speaking in other words – drive in a peg in emptiness, and from him draw coordinates: x, y, z, t; also put a roulette to emptiness that cannot be done. And to what this peg is adhered? Here intuitively everyone assume a certain based ether (filler, light’s environment and portable for all rest). All this is equal what to stand on a position of concept – top and a bottom in space.
The ether is a concept virtual!
And movement of light is not absolutely movement, and light (radio waves) is not absolutely waves, or at all waves, and "prints" on the fourth measurement. All four coordinates: x; y; z; t it is possible to lead from any point of space, and goes or there is an object (or objects) is a concept is deprived any sense. How many you were dispersed, for light (current of time) you always cost on a place. Neither on meter, nor on centimeter, on millimeter you do not come nearer to light. Light is carrots on a fishing tackle ahead of a donkey (and behind too, as well as from sides), light is a movement virtual, this current of time (the fourth measurement), it always with you, also, as well as other three. For light you always cost on a place! Light catches up, overtakes us and goes to us towards always with the same speed – 300 t. Km/s from what spaces it proceeded.And it is unreasonable to speak about any approach speed of light, and to speak: "to fly faster light", all this is equal what to speak: "to fly faster time".
Read closely my 5 chapter (Travel on
Chobruchi ), in 4 light years I have covered distance for 11 months. Unless I flied faster light? For light I all road stood on a place. During dispersal, then in free flight and during braking – all road for light I stood on a place! During dispersal I did smooth transition of one space in another, the fifth, the tenth when has switched off the engine – was fixed in the last. All spaces identical, but "are revolved" be relative each other in the fourth measurement, and time goes equally, but separately in other coordinates, at me it has passed simply less .Time does not go one in one, it goes separately!
One of thresholds of habitual thinking – in one place has passed more time, in the friend it is less!
The second threshold of habitual thinking – spaces are relative!
I saw a galaxy as under a diminutive lens,
on a direction of flight she "has been compressed" on: Kd = Ö ((C + V)/(C – V)) And in cross-section directions to flight it is less: Kt = (Kd+1/Kd)/2She looked flat, as a narrow star strip. Pertinently to lead analogy to plane: when you in it fly, terrestrial objects seem to you small, and distances between them accordingly scanty, and it is unreasonable to put a ruler to glass of a window. Here, as they say: do not trust the eyes.
Well and stars, from a board of a spacecraft, will seem certainly motionless. Well and if near to the ship in galactic space to spread out kilometer columns how many they will pass or flash at me in a window for a second?
Them will pass at me behind a board – millions a second! (see. The chapter - 9)But, I shall see, that between columns there is no kilometer, and in my space these columns move less, than 300 thousand in km/s. The same picture will be seen also by the observer from galactic space: I, with the kilometer columns between which there is no kilometer, fly by by him with the same speed.
So that such speed? These are kilometers a second. But whose kilometers and in whose second?
If I take the kilometers and time it will be, that speed by which we have got used to measure all – V.
To you the first relativity of speed.
If I shall take their kilometers and time I shall name this speed in the imaginary speed - Vm.
This that speed where their kilometer columns will flash at me behind a board, in millions a second.
To you the second relativity of speed.
The third relativity:
It when the third observer "sees" a difference between two other objects.
For example:
Fly by two objects by the Earth:
At the first V = 299,784872200567363944546414389614 thousand km/s.
The second lags behind him, at him V = 299,602239389441111963018984171545 thousand km/s.
What between them speed?
Between them – 276,805111063643564796742822907365 thousand km/s.
To you subtraction of speeds: V3 = C2 * (V1 – V2)/(C2 – V1*V2)
To you and addition of speeds: V3 = C2 * (V1 + V2)/(C2 + V1*V2) on Einstein, and you sense of it: The appendix 1 It turns out, that speed – concept three times relative. And in general, if by and large, speed – concept senseless! I explain it more in detail:And speed of light is at all speed, and horizon of observable events!
Speed of light cannot be understood in a literal sense, speed of light is
indefinitely big speed, it is possible to tell virtual speed, she should not be compared to mechanical movement, she is as though limited to a limit – 300 thousand km/s . (current of time), it simply horizon of observable events.If to speak about speed it is necessary to do numerous clauses: whose kilometers, whose seconds and from what space to look.
I in general would refuse kilometers and seconds, and would enter new concept of speed. As the big distances are measured not in kilometers, and in light units. As also speed it is necessary to measure Doplers`s by factor – Kd. Speed on Doplers`s will be in limits: from unit indefinitely. Kd → 1 ÷ ∞. It will be absolute accuracy of speed between two objects. At mutual speed zero Kd =1.
I in the example ( 5-chapter ), it was dispersed till the speed: Kd =19.The concept - "at light speeds" – is radically wrong, would be more correct to speak - "at horizons speeds". How many we were dispersed, for light we always cost on a place, to be exact would be to tell: not for light, and concerning the beginning of the fourth measurement, as well as concerning the beginning of other three measurements of spaces, i.e. the beginning of all four measurements always with us, and in any space – our speed a zero, with all four measurements. Whether you go in a train or fly in the plane, all three measurements always with you, i.e. any speed can be accepted for a zero. Then why only three? Unless the fourth measurement is not equal in rights with other three? All means 4 measurements always with us!
Simply when we are dispersed – we change spaces, one by one, in each of which we cost on a place, with all four measurements of new space, and be dispersed it is (linearly) some. And to the observer will seem, that at approach a rod – 299792,458 km/s at you acceleration falls, and it is a maximum that you can reach. It is comparable to movement on a sphere: the automobile already at horizon seems to the observer, that, and the motorist sees, that how many it goes – the horizon costs on a place, on the same removal, and the observer who has remained, it behind at horizon.
All spaces are equal in rights!
(fig. 1)
Fig. 1. To concept about equality of spaces. Spaces 2; 3; 4; 5; 6, etc. are similar to space 1, and the horizon of speed – remains on a place.
Be dispersed it is some, at dispersal the previous spaces for you are turned off, and new – are unwrapped. It seems to the observer on the contrary – you, with the space, are turned off at horizon of speed (299792,458 km/s), and for you the horizon costs all on the same removal, and still it is possible to be dispersed so much and still though 100 times on so much!
For observers from any space, you cannot surpass this horizon of speed, and will merge with it, as well as observers, in relation to you.
To you imaginary
Lorenc`s
reductions!
On the accelerator, at dispersal of a particle, apparently, that at it acceleration falls. We admit you to it give 10 m/s2, but whose meters? And in whose second? She already in the other space. That for you 1 sec
, for it 0,1 sec, for you of 10 m, and for it 100 m, means you try to give to it acceleration – 100 m for 0,1 sec, or 1000 m/s2, and constantly increase acceleration. Imagine, that you someone pushes in a back from other space, at him the of a measure, at you the. And false representation about increase in weight is created ! (The appendix - 1)24.11.02 ljubar V.J.
To write to me the letter:
Extreme corrections: on October, 20 , 2005.
